Are deficits free?

A-Tier
Journal: Journal of Public Economics
Year: 2022
Volume: 208
Issue: C

Authors (4)

Brumm, Johannes (not in RePEc) Feng, Xiangyu (not in RePEc) Kotlikoff, Laurence (not in RePEc) Kubler, Felix (Universität Zürich)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Deficit finance, a.k.a. pay-go policy, is free when growth rates routinely exceed safe government borrowing rates. Or so many say. This note presents four counterexamples based on four versions of a simple OLG economy. In each version the growth rate exceeds the safe rate for one of four reasons – uninsured idiosyncratic risk, uninsured aggregate risk, policy uncertainty, and imperfect financial intermediation. Deficit finance does not directly address any of these problems. What works, respectively speaking, is progressive taxation, bilateral intergenerational risk-sharing, early policy resolution, and improved intermediation. The four examples thus show that seemingly free deficits may be more costly than they appear. Indeed, inefficient pay-go policy can even lower the government’s borrowing rate, encouraging yet more deficit finance.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:pubeco:v:208:y:2022:i:c:s0047272722000299
Journal Field
Public
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-25