Does Biology Drive Child Penalties? Evidence from Biological and Adoptive Families

A-Tier
Journal: American Economic Review: Insights
Year: 2021
Volume: 3
Issue: 2
Pages: 183-98

Score contribution per author:

1.341 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This paper investigates whether the impact of children on the labor market outcomes of women relative to men—child penalties—can be explained by the biological links between mother and child. We estimate child penalties in biological and adoptive families using event studies around the arrival of children and almost 40 years of adoption data from Denmark. Short-run child penalties are slightly larger for biological mothers than for adoptive mothers, but their long-run child penalties are virtually identical and precisely estimated. This suggests that biology is not a key driver of child-related gender gaps.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:aea:aerins:v:3:y:2021:i:2:p:183-98
Journal Field
General
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25