Human Capital Versus Sorting: The Effects of Compulsory Attendance Laws

S-Tier
Journal: Quarterly Journal of Economics
Year: 1986
Volume: 101
Issue: 3
Pages: 609-624

Authors (2)

Kevin Lang (Boston University) David Kropp (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

4.022 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Under the educational sorting hypothesis a state compulsory school attendance law will increase the educational attainment of high-ability workers who are not directly affected by the law. Under the human capital hypothesis such laws affect only those individuals whose behavior is directly constrained. We find that compulsory attendance laws do increase enrollment rates in age groups they do not affect directly. Thus, our results contradict the human capital hypothesis and are consistent with the sorting hypothesis.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:qjecon:v:101:y:1986:i:3:p:609-624.
Journal Field
General
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25