Who wins, who loses? Understanding the spatially differentiated effects of the belt and road initiative

A-Tier
Journal: Journal of Development Economics
Year: 2020
Volume: 146
Issue: C

Authors (2)

Lall, Somik V. (not in RePEc) Lebrand, Mathilde (World Bank Group)

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This paper examines how cities and regions within countries adjust to trade openness and improved connectivity driven by large transport investments from China’s Belt and Road Initiative. The paper presents a general equilibrium model alongside spatially detailed information on the location of people, economic activity, and transport costs in Central Asia and China. The model builds on Fajgelbaum and Redding (2018) adding restrictions on internal mobility. We use this framework to identify which places are likely to gain and which places are likely to lose. The findings are that BRI transport investments favor development in larger urban districts near trade hubs, while people in more distant regions tend to lose out. Investments in trade facilitation are complementary policies that bring large additional welfare gains and can help in spatially spreading the benefits. However, barriers to internal labor mobility are likely to exacerbate wage inequalities while dampening overall welfare.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:deveco:v:146:y:2020:i:c:s0304387820300717
Journal Field
Development
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25