Score contribution per author:
α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count
We provide a guide to using autoregressive distributed lag models for impulse response estimations with an identified structural shock or an external instrument for the shock. We illustrate how specifications widely used in practice can lead to inconsistent and inefficient estimators. We further review empirical results from previous papers and show that some results appear to be statistical artefacts. We propose a simple method to avoid such a false conclusion from biases or large standard errors and obtain consistent and precise estimates.