Does the Flypaper Model Stick? A Test of the Relative Performance of the Flypaper and Conventional Models of Local Government Budgetary Behaviour.

B-Tier
Journal: Public Choice
Year: 1991
Volume: 69
Issue: 1
Pages: 1-18

Authors (3)

Barnett, Richard R (not in RePEc) Levaggi, Rosella (Università degli Studi di Bres...) Smith, Peter (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Two of the most widely referred to models of local (or state) budgetary behavior are developed and tested. The models considered are a variant of the flypaper model (see, for example, Courant et al., 1979 and Oates, 1979) and a conventional model which builds on the seminal work of Wilde (1969, 1971). The models are developed in a manner which allows them to be tested empirically using data for English local government. Two types of test are employed: the ability of the two models to explain the variation in expediture levels across local governments within any given fiscal year; the ability of the models to predict future levels of expenditure given changes to local government budget constraints (as brought about, for example, by changes in grants-in-aid from central government). Copyright 1991 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:kap:pubcho:v:69:y:1991:i:1:p:1-18
Journal Field
Public
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25