Checks and Balances on Political Budget Cycles: Cross‐Country Evidence

C-Tier
Journal: Kyklos
Year: 2009
Volume: 62
Issue: 3
Pages: 426-447

Score contribution per author:

0.335 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 0.5x C-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Previous empirical work on political budget cycles (PBCs) implicitly assumes the executive has full discretion over fiscal policy. Instead, we ask what happens when legislative checks and balances limit executive discretion. We find that legislative checks and balances moderate PBCs in countries with high compliance with the law. More effective checks and balances help to explain why cycles are weaker in developed countries and in established democracies. When the discretional component of executive power is isolated, there are significant cycles in all democracies.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:bla:kyklos:v:62:y:2009:i:3:p:426-447
Journal Field
General
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25