Testing Wagner versus Keynes using disaggregated public expenditure data for Canada

C-Tier
Journal: Applied Economics
Year: 1999
Volume: 31
Issue: 10
Pages: 1283-1291

Authors (3)

Bagala Biswal (not in RePEc) Urvashi Dhawan (not in RePEc) Hooi-Yean Lee (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.335 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 0.5x C-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This paper attempts to test Wagnerian versus Keynesian hypotheses by examining the relationship between national income and total public expenditure as well as its various components for Canada during the period 1950-1995. Engle and Granger's two-step cointegration and error correction techniques are employed to test these two hypotheses. The results of this study support both the hypotheses when tested with broader aggregate expenditure data, i.e. total government current expenditure (CE) and total current expenditures on goods and services (CEGS). Although the results of this study do not support the existence of any long-run relationship between GDP and the disaggregated public expenditure variables, they do support the existence of short-run causation implying that national income may be causing or caused by a component of the total government current expenditure in the short run.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:taf:applec:v:31:y:1999:i:10:p:1283-1291
Journal Field
General
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25