Left-Digit Bias at Lyft

S-Tier
Journal: Review of Economic Studies
Year: 2023
Volume: 90
Issue: 6
Pages: 3186-3237

Authors (4)

John A List (National Bureau of Economic Re...) Ian Muirex (not in RePEc) Devin Pope (not in RePEc) Gregory Sun (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Left-digit bias (or 99-cent pricing) has been discussed extensively in economics, psychology, and marketing. Despite this, we show that the rideshare company, Lyft, was not using a 99-cent pricing strategy prior to our study. Based on observational data from over 600 million Lyft sessions followed by a field experiment conducted with 21 million Lyft passengers, we provide evidence of large discontinuities in demand at dollar values. Approximately half of the downward slope of the demand curve occurs discontinuously as the price of a ride drops below a dollar value (e.g. $14.00 to $13.99). If our short-run estimates persist in the longer run, we calculate that Lyft could increase its profits by roughly $160M per year by employing a left-digit bias pricing strategy. Our results showcase the robustness of an important behavioral bias for a large, modern company and its persistence in a highly competitive market.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:restud:v:90:y:2023:i:6:p:3186-3237.
Journal Field
General
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-25