Voice and Growth: Was Churchill Right?

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Economic History
Year: 2003
Volume: 63
Issue: 2
Pages: 315-350

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 1 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

The debate over whether political democracy is the least bad regime, as Churchill said, remains unresolved because history has been misread, and because statistical studies have chosen the wrong tests. This address reinterprets five key experiences to show how the institutional channels linking voice and growth are evolving with the economy. Until the early nineteenth century, the key institutional link was property-rights and contract enforcement. Since then, the human-investment channel has assumed an ever-greater role. Elite rule damages growth by underinvesting in egalitarian human capital, especially primary schooling, relative to historical norms for successful economies.This Presidential Address was delivered at the Economic History Association Annual Meeting, 12 October 2002, in St. Louis, Missouri.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:cup:jechis:v:63:y:2003:i:02:p:315-350_00
Journal Field
Economic History
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-01-25