An empirical analysis of energy intensity and the role of policy instruments

B-Tier
Journal: Energy Policy
Year: 2020
Volume: 145
Issue: C

Authors (3)

Azhgaliyeva, Dina (not in RePEc) Liu, Yang (not in RePEc) Liddle, Brantley (National University of Singapo...)

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

The reduction of energy intensity is important for sustainable economic growth, especially in non-OECD countries where energy demand growth is high. Understanding the impact of policies on energy intensity can help policy-makers to reduce energy intensity. Using empirical methods and cross-country data from 44 countries over the period 1990–2016, we study the determinants of energy intensity. The common correlated effects mean group estimator is employed since it addresses nonstationarity, cross-sectional dependence, and heterogeneity—all three of which exist in the data. Both GDP per capita and economy-wide energy prices are shown to be negatively associated with energy intensity. The empirical results provide evidence that several policy instruments are effective in reducing energy intensity: (i) standards, and labeling; (ii) government direct investment; (iii) strategic planning and support; (iv) fiscal measures/taxes; and (v) grants and subsidies. The duration of the policy is more important than the mere existence of the policy in demonstrating the policy's effectiveness.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:enepol:v:145:y:2020:i:c:s030142152030495x
Journal Field
Energy
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25