Does health affect portfolio choice?

B-Tier
Journal: Health Economics
Year: 2010
Volume: 19
Issue: 12
Pages: 1441-1460

Authors (2)

David A. Love (Williams College) Paul A. Smith (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

A number of recent studies find that poor health is empirically associated with a safer portfolio allocation. It is difficult to say, however, whether this relationship is truly causal. Both health status and portfolio choice are influenced by unobserved characteristics such as risk attitudes, impatience, information, and motivation, and these unobserved factors, if not adequately controlled for, can induce significant bias in the estimates of asset demand equations. Using the 1992–2006 waves of the Health and Retirement Study, we investigate how much of the connection between health and portfolio choice is causal and how much is due to the effects of unobserved heterogeneity. Accounting for unobserved heterogeneity with fixed effects and correlated random effects models, we find that health does not appear to significantly affect portfolio choice among single households. For married households, we find a small effect (about 2–3 percentage points) from being in the lowest of five self‐reported health categories. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:wly:hlthec:v:19:y:2010:i:12:p:1441-1460
Journal Field
Health
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25