Do Elections Always Motivate Incumbents? Learning vs. Re-Election Concerns

B-Tier
Journal: Public Choice
Year: 2006
Volume: 129
Issue: 1
Pages: 41-60

Authors (2)

Eric Borgne (not in RePEc) Ben Lockwood (University of Warwick)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This paper studies a principal-agent model of the relationship between office-holder and an electorate, where everyone is initially uninformed about the office-holder’s ability. If office-holder effort and ability interact in the determination of performance in office, then an office-holder has an incentive to learn, i.e., raise effort so that performance becomes a more accurate signal of her ability. Elections reduce the learning effect, and the reduction in this effect may more than offset the positive “re-election concerns” effect of elections on effort, implying higher effort with appointment. When this occurs, appointment of officials may welfare-dominate elections. Copyright Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:kap:pubcho:v:129:y:2006:i:1:p:41-60
Journal Field
Public
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25