A study of competing designs for a liquidity-saving mechanism

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Banking & Finance
Year: 2010
Volume: 34
Issue: 8
Pages: 1818-1826

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We study two designs for a liquidity-saving mechanism (LSM), a queuing arrangement used with an interbank settlement system. With a balance-reactive LSM, banks can set a balance threshold below which payments are not released from the queue, an action not possible with a receipt-reactive LSM. Payments that are costly to delay are settled earlier with a receipt reactive LSM. Payments that are not costly to delay may be queued with a balance reactive LSM but are always delayed with a receipt reactive LSM. We show that either system can provide higher welfare.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jbfina:v:34:y:2010:i:8:p:1818-1826
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25