Do Environmental Markets Improve on Open Access? Evidence from California Groundwater Rights

S-Tier
Journal: Journal of Political Economy
Year: 2021
Volume: 129
Issue: 10
Pages: 2817 - 2860

Authors (3)

Andrew B. Ayres (University of Nevada-Reno) Kyle C. Meng (not in RePEc) Andrew J. Plantinga (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

2.681 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Environmental markets are widely prescribed as an alternative to open access regimes for natural resources. We develop a model of dynamic groundwater extraction to demonstrate how a spatial regression discontinuity design that exploits a spatially incomplete market for groundwater rights recovers a lower bound on the market’s net benefit. We apply this estimator to a major aquifer in water-scarce southern California and find that a groundwater market generated substantial net benefits, as capitalized in land values. Heterogeneity analyses point to gains arising in part from rights trading, enabling more efficient water use across sectors. Additional findings suggest that the market increased groundwater levels.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:ucp:jpolec:doi:10.1086/715075
Journal Field
General
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-24