Direct Democracy and Public Employees

S-Tier
Journal: American Economic Review
Year: 2009
Volume: 99
Issue: 5
Pages: 2227-46

Score contribution per author:

8.043 = (α=2.01 / 1 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

In the public sector, employment may be inefficiently high because of patronage, and wages may be inefficiently high because of public employee interest groups. This paper explores whether the initiative process, a direct democracy institution of growing importance, ameliorates these political economy problems. In a sample of 650+ cities, I find that when public employees cannot bargain collectively and patronage could be a problem, initiatives appear to cut employment but not wages. When public employees bargain collectively, driving up wages, the initiative appears to cut wages but not employment. The employment-cutting result is robust; the wage-cutting result survives some but not all robustness tests. (JEL D72, J31, J45, J52)

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:aea:aecrev:v:99:y:2009:i:5:p:2227-46
Journal Field
General
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-01-25