Cap-and-trade, taxes, and distributional conflict

A-Tier
Journal: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
Year: 2012
Volume: 63
Issue: 1
Pages: 51-65

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Enacting market-based environmental regulation, such as emissions taxes and cap-and-trade programs, often create rents that are contested by agents. In this paper, we create a framework that compares social welfare from alternative market-based environmental policy instruments under the presence of rent seeking. We show that, contrary to the commonly held view, non-revenue-raising instruments (NRRIs) are in many cases preferable over revenue-raising instruments (RRIs). We find that the choice of instrument depends on the size of a potential revenue-recycling effect and the level of preassigned rents.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jeeman:v:63:y:2012:i:1:p:51-65
Journal Field
Environment
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25