Insuring legislative wealth transfers: theory and evidence

B-Tier
Journal: Public Choice
Year: 2022
Volume: 192
Issue: 1
Pages: 127-144

Authors (3)

Bryan P. Cutsinger (not in RePEc) Alexander Marsella (Berry College) Yang Zhou (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.673 = (α=2.02 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Abstract The interest group theory of government assumes that the state’s primary purpose is to facilitate wealth transfers between special interests. The values of the transfers depend on their durability, which can be increased by mechanisms that raise the cost of repealing them. Nonetheless, such mechanisms cannot function perfectly, and, thus, uncertainty surrounding their durability remains. We argue that the uncertainty could be mitigated by an insurance mechanism that compensates interest groups if other durability-enhancing mechanisms fail. To illustrate how such an insurance mechanism works, we rely on the 2014 settlements between the Department of Justice and Bank of America and Citigroup, respectively, which required both banks to donate to housing-counseling organizations whose funding Congress had reduced three years earlier.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:kap:pubcho:v:192:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11127-022-00975-5
Journal Field
Public
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25