The monopolist is not the best environmentalist’s best friend: An example

C-Tier
Journal: Economics Letters
Year: 2012
Volume: 115
Issue: 3
Pages: 379-382

Score contribution per author:

0.503 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 0.5x C-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This letter addresses the second-degree price discrimination issue when a monopolized product is tied with environmental quality. The monopolist may degrade environmental quality too much when marginal valuations of environmental quality and the good itself are positively related across consumers.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:ecolet:v:115:y:2012:i:3:p:379-382
Journal Field
General
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25