Sample selection versus two-part models revisited: The case of female smoking and drinking

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Health Economics
Year: 2008
Volume: 27
Issue: 2
Pages: 300-307

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 1 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

There is a well-established debate between Heckman sample selection and two-part models in health econometrics, particularly when no obvious exclusion restrictions are available. Most of this debate has focussed on the application of these models to health care expenditure. This paper revisits the debate in the context of female smoking and drinking, and evaluates the two approaches on three grounds: theoretical, practical and statistical. The two-part model is generally favoured but it is stressed that this comparison should be carried out on a case-by-case basis.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jhecon:v:27:y:2008:i:2:p:300-307
Journal Field
Health
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-01-26