Prenatal exposure to particulate matter and infant birth outcomes: Evidence from a population‐wide database

B-Tier
Journal: Health Economics
Year: 2024
Volume: 33
Issue: 9
Pages: 2182-2200

Authors (7)

Babak Jahanshahi (not in RePEc) Brian Johnston (not in RePEc) Mark E. McGovern (Rutgers Universty-Piscataway) Duncan McVicar (Queen's University) Dermot O’Reilly (not in RePEc) Neil Rowland (not in RePEc) Stavros Vlachos (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.287 = (α=2.01 / 7 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

There are growing concerns about the impact of pollution on maternal and infant health. Despite an extensive correlational literature, observational studies which adopt methods that seek to address potential biases due to unmeasured confounders draw mixed conclusions. Using a population database of births in Northern Ireland (NI) linked to localized geographic information on pollution in mothers' postcodes (zipcodes) of residence during pregnancy, we examine whether prenatal exposure to PM2.5 is associated with a comprehensive range of birth outcomes, including placental health. Overall, we find little evidence that particulate matter is related to infant outcomes at the pollution levels experienced in NI, once we implement a mother fixed effects approach that accounts for time‐invariant factors. This contrasts with strong associations in models that adjust for observed confounders but without fixed effects. While reducing ambient air pollution remains an urgent public health priority globally, our results imply that further improvements in short‐run levels of prenatal PM2.5 exposure in a relatively low‐pollution, higher‐income country context, are unlikely to impact on birth outcomes at the population level.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:wly:hlthec:v:33:y:2024:i:9:p:2182-2200
Journal Field
Health
Author Count
7
Added to Database
2026-01-26