Polarization and pandering in common-interest elections

B-Tier
Journal: Games and Economic Behavior
Year: 2022
Volume: 133
Issue: C
Pages: 150-161

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 1 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Adding candidates to a one-dimensional common-interest voting model, this paper shows that catering to centrist voters can lower social welfare. The electoral benefit of doing so is weak, so candidates polarize substantially in equilibrium, resolving a long-standing empirical puzzle.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:gamebe:v:133:y:2022:i:c:p:150-161
Journal Field
Theory
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-01-26