A Reassessment of Real Business Cycle Theory

S-Tier
Journal: American Economic Review
Year: 2014
Volume: 104
Issue: 5
Pages: 177-82

Score contribution per author:

4.022 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

During the downturn of 2008–2009, output and hours fell significantly, but labor productivity rose. These facts have led many to conclude that there is a significant deviation between observations and current macrotheories that assume business cycles are driven, at least in part, by fluctuations in total factor productivities of firms. We show that once investment in intangible capital is included in the analysis, there is no inconsistency. Measured labor productivity rises if the fall in output is underestimated; this occurs when there are large unmeasured intangible investments. Microevidence suggests that these investments are large and cyclically important.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:aea:aecrev:v:104:y:2014:i:5:p:177-82
Journal Field
General
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-26