Turning over Turnover

A-Tier
Journal: The Review of Financial Studies
Year: 2007
Volume: 20
Issue: 6
Pages: 1749-1782

Authors (2)

K. J. Martijn Cremers (not in RePEc) Jianping Mei (Cheung Kong Graduate School of...)

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This article applies the methodology of Bai and Ng (2002, 2004) for decomposing panel data into systematic and idiosyncratic components to both stock returns and turnover panels. This approach works well for both returns and turnover, despite the presence of severe heteroscedasticity and nonstationarity of individual stocks' turnover. We test the mutual fund separation model of Lo and Wang (2000). Trading due to systematic risk in returns can account for 66% of systematic turnover. Thus, portfolio rebalancing due to systematic risk is a very important motive for stock trading. Finally, several common turnover measures may understate the impact of stock trading. , Oxford University Press.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:rfinst:v:20:y:2007:i:6:p:1749-1782
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-26