Regulatory review time and pharmaceutical research and development

B-Tier
Journal: Health Economics
Year: 2021
Volume: 30
Issue: 1
Pages: 113-128

Authors (4)

Anna Chorniy (not in RePEc) James Bailey (West Virginia University) Abdulkadir Civan (not in RePEc) Michael Maloney

Score contribution per author:

0.503 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

In the United States, all newly developed drugs undergo a lengthy review process conducted by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). These regulatory delays have direct immediate costs for drug manufacturers and patients waiting for treatment. Under certain market conditions, regulatory delays may also affect future research and development (R&D) strategies of pharmaceutical companies. To estimate the magnitude of this effect, we match data on drugs in the development pipeline in 2006 to data that we collect on FDA review times for all drugs approved between 1999 and 2005. Employing a rich and novel set of controls that affect drug R&D decisions and, potentially, regulatory review lags, we find that on average, three additional months of delay result in one fewer drug in development in that drug category. Our results suggest that the length of the regulatory delay matters for pharmaceutical firms' R&D decisions and that the firms are likely unable to pass on these costs onto consumers.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:wly:hlthec:v:30:y:2021:i:1:p:113-128
Journal Field
Health
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-24