DOES THE MINIMUM LEGAL DRINKING AGE SAVE LIVES?

C-Tier
Journal: Economic Inquiry
Year: 2009
Volume: 47
Issue: 2
Pages: 317-336

Authors (2)

JEFFREY A. MIRON (Harvard University) ELINA TETELBAUM (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.503 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 0.5x C-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

The minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) is widely believed to save lives by reducing traffic fatalities among underage drivers. Further, the Federal Uniform Drinking Age Act, which pressured all states to adopt an MLDA of 21, is regarded as having contributed enormously to this life‐saving effect. This article challenges both claims. State‐level panel data for the past 30 yr show that any nationwide impact of the MLDA is driven by states that increased their MLDA prior to any inducement from the federal government. Even in early‐adopting states, the impact of the MLDA did not persist much past the year of adoption. The MLDA appears to have only a minor impact on teen drinking. (JEL H11, K42)

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:bla:ecinqu:v:47:y:2009:i:2:p:317-336
Journal Field
General
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-26