Who's naughty? Who's nice? Experiments on whether pro-social workers are selected out of cutthroat business environments

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
Year: 2015
Volume: 109
Issue: C
Pages: 173-187

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Levitt and List (2007) hypothesize that pro-social individuals will be selected out of cutthroat industries. To study this, we measure the pro-social preferences of individuals in two such industries, domain trading and online adult entertainment (pornography). Contrary to the selection hypothesis, we find that these individuals exhibit a high degree of pro-sociality. They exhibit more altruism, trust, trustworthiness, and honesty than the typical student subject. They also respond differently to shame-based incentives. We offer a theory of reverse selection that can rationalize these findings.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jeborg:v:109:y:2015:i:c:p:173-187
Journal Field
Theory
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-26