Plan responses to diagnosis-based payment: Evidence from Germany’s morbidity-based risk adjustment

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Health Economics
Year: 2017
Volume: 56
Issue: C
Pages: 397-413

Score contribution per author:

0.503 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Many competitive health insurance markets adjust payments to participating health plans according to their enrollees’ risk − including based on diagnostic information. We investigate responses of German health plans to the introduction of morbidity-based risk adjustment in the Statutory Health Insurance in 2009, which triggers payments based on “validated” diagnoses by providers. Using the regulator’s data from office-based physicians, we estimate a difference-in-difference analysis of the change in the share and number of validated diagnoses for ICD codes that are inside or outside the risk adjustment but are otherwise similar. We find a differential increase in the share of validated diagnoses of 2.6 and 3.6 percentage points (3–4%) between 2008 and 2013. This increase appears to originate from both a shift from not-validated toward validated diagnoses and an increase in the number of such diagnoses. Overall, our results indicate that plans were successful in influencing physicians’ coding practices in a way that could lead to higher payments.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jhecon:v:56:y:2017:i:c:p:397-413
Journal Field
Health
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-24