Do report cards predict future quality? The case of skilled nursing facilities

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Health Economics
Year: 2019
Volume: 66
Issue: C
Pages: 208-221

Authors (4)

Cornell, Portia Y. (not in RePEc) Grabowski, David C. (not in RePEc) Norton, Edward C. (University of Michigan) Rahman, Momotazur (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.503 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Report cards on provider performance are intended to improve consumer decision-making and address information gaps in the market for quality. However, inadequate risk adjustment of report-card measures often biases comparisons across providers. We test whether going to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) with a higher star rating leads to better quality outcomes for a patient. We exploit variation over time in the distance from a patient’s residential ZIP code to SNFs with different ratings to estimate the causal effect of admission to a higher-rated SNF on health care outcomes, including mortality. We found that patients who go to higher-rated SNFs achieved better outcomes, supporting the validity of the SNF report card ratings.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jhecon:v:66:y:2019:i:c:p:208-221
Journal Field
Health
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-26