The end of an era: Who paid the price when the livestock futures pits closed?

A-Tier
Journal: American Journal of Agricultural Economics
Year: 2024
Volume: 106
Issue: 3
Pages: 1111-1140

Authors (2)

Eleni Gousgounis (not in RePEc) Esen Onur (Government of the United State...)

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This paper evaluates the impact of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange's (CME) decision to close the livestock futures pits on the execution quality of customer orders. Our findings suggest that, prior to its closure, the livestock futures pit offers high immediacy execution and attracts large orders. Because such high immediacy orders generally execute faster and cost more, their migration to the electronic market after the pit closure explains why the execution of electronic orders becomes on average speedier and more expensive for customers who used to be active pit users. However, our results also indicate that these pit‐user customers face a lower overall execution cost following the pit closure when we account for all their orders, pit and electronic.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:wly:ajagec:v:106:y:2024:i:3:p:1111-1140
Journal Field
Agricultural
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-26