Cost Benefit Analyses versus Referenda

S-Tier
Journal: Journal of Political Economy
Year: 2010
Volume: 118
Issue: 1
Pages: 156-187

Score contribution per author:

4.022 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We consider a planner who chooses between two public policies and ask whether a referendum or a cost benefit analysis leads to higher welfare. We find that a referendum leads to higher welfare than a cost benefit analysis in a "common value" environment. Cost benefit analysis is better in a "private value" environment. (c) 2010 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:ucp:jpolec:v:118:y:2010:i:1:p:156-187
Journal Field
General
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-26