The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Reply

S-Tier
Journal: American Economic Review
Year: 2012
Volume: 102
Issue: 6
Pages: 3077-3110

Score contribution per author:

2.681 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson (2001) established that economic institutions today are correlated with expected mortality of European colonialists. David Albouy argues this relationship is not robust. He drops all data from Latin America and much of the data from Africa, making up almost 60 percent of our sample, despite much information on the mortality of Europeans in those places during the colonial period. He also includes a "campaign" dummy that is coded inconsistently; even modest corrections undermine his claims. We also show that limiting the effect of outliers strengthens our results, making them robust to even extreme versions of Albouy's critiques. (JEL D02, E23, F54, I12, N40, O43, P14)

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:aea:aecrev:v:102:y:2012:i:6:p:3077-3110
Journal Field
General
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-24