Gender penalties and solidarity — Teaching evaluation differentials in and out of STEM

C-Tier
Journal: Economics Letters
Year: 2023
Volume: 226
Issue: C

Authors (2)

Score contribution per author:

0.503 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 0.5x C-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Employing a comprehensive, ten-year data set of class-level observations and institutional data from a large US university, we explore gender disparities in STEM fields by isolating differences in student evaluations of teaching effectiveness (SETEs). Faculty teaching face-to-face or hybrid classes receive significantly higher scores on average when compared to themselves online — a premium that is independent of gender. In STEM fields, the face-to-face premium for males is double that for females. The gender composition of the class matters. As the percentage of female students increases, SETE scores increase on average for females teaching in STEM fields but not for males. These results have implications for the ongoing problem of retention of women in STEM fields.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:ecolet:v:226:y:2023:i:c:s0165176523001088
Journal Field
General
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-24