Should Urban Transit Subsidies Be Reduced?

S-Tier
Journal: American Economic Review
Year: 2009
Volume: 99
Issue: 3
Pages: 700-724

Score contribution per author:

4.022 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This paper derives empirically tractable formulas for the welfare effects of fare adjustments in passenger peak and off-peak rail and bus transit, and for optimal pricing of those services. The formulas account for congestion, pollution, accident externalities, scale economies, and agency adjustment of transit service offerings. We apply them using parameter values for Washington (DC), Los Angeles, and London. The results support the efficiency of the large current fare subsidies; even starting with fares at 50 percent of operating costs, incremental fare reductions are welfare improving in almost all cases. These findings are robust to alternative assumptions and parameters. (JEL L92, R41, R42, R48)

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:aea:aecrev:v:99:y:2009:i:3:p:700-724
Journal Field
General
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-28