Counterpart funding requirements and the foreign aid procyclicality puzzle

C-Tier
Journal: Oxford Review of Economic Policy
Year: 2015
Volume: 31
Issue: 3-4
Pages: 462-480

Score contribution per author:

0.503 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 0.5x C-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Official development assistance is a key source of external finance in many developing countries. A striking feature of these aid flows is their positive correlation with business cycles in recipient countries. This pattern is puzzling in that it reinforces recipients’ already strong and costly macroeconomic fluctuations. We propose a simple model of investment financing and aid provision under asymmetric information that rationalizes such a pattern. We assume that donor agencies and recipient governments value projects differently, and that donors know less than recipients do about project characteristics. We show that donors can make a recipient government identify high-return projects by requiring that the latter contribute some of its own funds to projects. Providing these matching grants or ‘counterpart funds’ is less affordable for recipients during economic downturns, which leads to aid procyclicality. Our model produces aid contracts consistent with those used by aid agencies, rationalizes observed aid patterns, and yields a rich set of testable empirical predictions.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:oxford:v:31:y:2015:i:3-4:p:462-480.
Journal Field
General
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-28