Fat tails and truncated bids in contingent valuation: An application to an endangered shorebird species

B-Tier
Journal: Ecological Economics
Year: 2016
Volume: 129
Issue: C
Pages: 210-219

Authors (2)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

A yes-response function in a contingent valuation study is said to have fat tails if it has a high and slowly declining yes-response rate at high bid levels. Truncated bids refer to the practice of dropping high bid offers before a yes-response rate of near zero is reached. This is a common practice in contingent valuation. We explore the extent and implications of fat tails and truncated bids in a study of an endangered shorebird species. We find, among other things, that mean willingness to pay is quite sensitive to the highest bid offered – so much so that the choice of highest bid nearly dictates outcomes.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:ecolec:v:129:y:2016:i:c:p:210-219
Journal Field
Environment
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-28