RESTRICTED STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND THE UNIT ROOT HYPOTHESIS

C-Tier
Journal: Economic Inquiry
Year: 2007
Volume: 45
Issue: 4
Pages: 834-853

Score contribution per author:

0.503 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 0.5x C-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

In a classic paper, Nelson and Plosser could not reject the unit root hypothesis in favor of trend stationarity for 13 out of 14 long‐term annual macro series. Subsequent studies, allowing for one or two structural changes, have found more rejections with a broken trend stationary alternative. Since these changes are defined to be permanent, the rejections do not provide evidence of trend stationarity. We propose new tests for a unit root in the presence of restricted structural change. Allowing for two offsetting structural changes, we reject the unit root null in favor of restricted trend stationarity for 6 out of 13 series. (JEL C22, E32)

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:bla:ecinqu:v:45:y:2007:i:4:p:834-853
Journal Field
General
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-28