Antitrust Settlements and Trial Outcomes.

A-Tier
Journal: Review of Economics and Statistics
Year: 1996
Volume: 78
Issue: 3
Pages: 401-09

Score contribution per author:

1.341 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Risk aversion plays an important role in explaining why antitrust cases settle instead of going to trial. Using a jointly estimated model of settlement and trial outcome, the authors find that a one percent increase in the probability that the plaintiff wins at trial raises the probability of a settlement by 0.13 percent. They also find that reputation effects are not a significant factor for defendants, so the risk aversion of the defendants does not play a dominant role in determining whether the parties settle. Plaintiffs are more likely to win in certain jurisdictions, which encourages venue shopping by plaintiffs. Copyright 1996 by MIT Press.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:tpr:restat:v:78:y:1996:i:3:p:401-09
Journal Field
General
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-29