Integrated care models and behavioral health care utilization: Quasi‐experimental evidence from Medicaid health homes

B-Tier
Journal: Health Economics
Year: 2020
Volume: 29
Issue: 9
Pages: 1086-1097

Authors (5)

Chandler McClellan (not in RePEc) Johanna Catherine Maclean (not in RePEc) Brendan Saloner (not in RePEc) Emma E. McGinty (not in RePEc) Michael F. Pesko (University of Missouri)

Score contribution per author:

0.402 = (α=2.01 / 5 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Integration of behavioral and general medical care can improve outcomes for individuals with behavioral health conditions—serious mental illness (SMI) and substance use disorder (SUD). However, behavioral health care has historically been segregated from general medical care in many countries. We provide the first population‐level evidence on the effects of Medicaid health homes (HH) on behavioral health care service use. Medicaid, a public insurance program in the United States, HHs were created under the 2010 Affordable Care Act to coordinate behavioral and general medical care for enrollees with behavioral health conditions. As of 2016, 16 states had adopted an HH for enrollees with SMI and/or SUD. We use data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health over the period 2010 to 2016 coupled with a two‐way fixed‐effects model to estimate HH effects on behavioral health care utilization. We find that HH adoption increases service use among enrollees, although mental health care treatment findings are sensitive to specification. Further, enrollee self‐reported health improves post‐HH.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:wly:hlthec:v:29:y:2020:i:9:p:1086-1097
Journal Field
Health
Author Count
5
Added to Database
2026-01-29