Do part-time/full-time compensation differentials for nurses vary between the private and public sector?

C-Tier
Journal: Applied Economics
Year: 2009
Volume: 41
Issue: 4
Pages: 537-546

Authors (3)

Richard McGregory (not in RePEc) M. Scott Niederjohn (not in RePEc) James Peoples (University of Wisconsin)

Score contribution per author:

0.335 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 0.5x C-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This study examines whether, compared to their private sector counterparts, public sector health care employers are at a disadvantage using part-time (PT) nurses to lower labour costs. Findings reveal a lack of a PT wage differential. Public and Private sector PT nurses are less likely to receive health care and pension coverage compared with full-time (FT) nurses. Yet, these PT/FT nonwage compensation coverage differentials do not vary across sectors. The nonwage findings are interpreted as suggesting that public sector health care employers are just as likely as private sector health care employers to benefit from cost savings associated with lower nonwage coverage for PT nurses.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:taf:applec:v:41:y:2009:i:4:p:537-546
Journal Field
General
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-29