More competition in delegated portfolio management: A win-win situation? An experimental analysis

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
Year: 2020
Volume: 178
Issue: C
Pages: 777-800

Authors (3)

Balmus, Tatiana (not in RePEc) Huber, Juergen (not in RePEc) Ploner, Matteo (Università degli Studi di Tren...)

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We investigate how competition between fund managers and disclosure of other managers’ fees and performance influence fees, risk taken, earnings, and investor concentration, with a controlled lab experiment. We find that more competition and disclosure lead to a reduction in fees: The relative decrease is larger for management fees than for performance fees. Although, the decrease in fees does not affect managers’ investment strategies, it increases investors’ readiness to entrust their funds to a manager. This leads to higher overall earnings, with the benefits going to investors and to fund managers able to attract more or new investors. The empirical literature provides a mixed picture of the consequences of competition in delegated portfolio management, but our results suggest that more competition is mostly beneficial for the development of capital markets.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jeborg:v:178:y:2020:i:c:p:777-800
Journal Field
Theory
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-29