Score contribution per author:
α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count
Outlying observations can bias regression estimates, requiring the use of outlier-robust estimators. Comparing robust estimates to those obtained using ordinary least squares (OLS) is a common robustness check, however, such comparisons have been mostly informal due to the lack of available tests. Here we introduce a formal test for coefficient distortion due to outliers in regression models. Our proposed test is based on the difference between OLS and robust estimates obtained using a class of Huber-skip M-type estimators (such as Impulse Indicator Saturation or Robustified Least Squares). We show that our distortion test has an asymptotic chi-squared distribution by establishing the asymptotics of the corresponding Huber-skip M-estimators using an empirical process Central Limit Theorem recently developed in the literature. The test is valid for cross-sectional, as well as panel, and stationary or deterministically-trending time series models. To improve finite sample performance and to alleviate concerns on distributional assumptions, we explore several bootstrap testing schemes. We apply our outlier distortion test to estimates of the macro-economic impacts of climate change allowing for adaptation.