By-elections, changing fortunes, uncertainty and the mid-term blues

B-Tier
Journal: Public Choice
Year: 1998
Volume: 95
Issue: 1
Pages: 131-148

Authors (2)

Simon Price (University of Essex) David Sanders (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

If voters care about the size of the government's majority, then by-election votes should exaggerate national swings. Moreover, if there is uncertainty about the outcome of the general election and if voters” preferences are skewed in such a way as to give more weight to the “downside” outcome (least favourite party wins) than the “upside” (favoured party wins with a larger than preferred majority), then there will be a systematic tendency for governments to lose by-elections, regardless of any changes in national support. These predictions go beyond those generated by conventional explanations. The theory is successfully tested against data from 383 post-War elections. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:kap:pubcho:v:95:y:1998:i:1:p:131-148
Journal Field
Public
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-29