The Heckman Correction for Sample Selection and Its Critique

C-Tier
Journal: Journal of Economic Surveys
Year: 2000
Volume: 14
Issue: 1
Pages: 53-68

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 1 authors) × 0.5x C-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This paper gives a short overview of Monte Carlo studies on the usefulness of Heckman’s (1976, 1979) two‐step estimator for estimating selection models. Such models occur frequently in empirical work, especially in microeconometrics when estimating wage equations or consumer expenditures. It is shown that exploratory work to check for collinearity problems is strongly recommended before deciding on which estimator to apply. In the absence of collinearity problems, the full‐information maximum likelihood estimator is preferable to the limited‐information two‐step method of Heckman, although the latter also gives reasonable results. If, however, collinearity problems prevail, subsample OLS (or the Two‐Part Model) is the most robust amongst the simple‐to‐calculate estimators.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:bla:jecsur:v:14:y:2000:i:1:p:53-68
Journal Field
General
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-01-29