Testing between Alternative Models of Choice under Uncertainty: Comment.

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
Year: 1993
Volume: 6
Issue: 2
Pages: 161-64

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 1 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Battaglio, Kagel, and Jiranyakul use experimental tests to compare rank-dependent expected utility (RDEU), regret theory, prospect theory, and Machina's generalized smooth preferences model. They conclude that none of these models consistently organizes the data. The purpose of this note is to point out that RDEU theory was tested in combination with a hypothesis on the choice of functional form that has been explicitly rejected by the original author of the model (Quiggin, 1982, 1987). When the original form of RDEU theory is tested, it performs quite well. Copyright 1993 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:kap:jrisku:v:6:y:1993:i:2:p:161-64
Journal Field
Theory
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-01-29