Nudging for prompt tax penalty payment: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
Year: 2024
Volume: 224
Issue: C
Pages: 548-579

Authors (3)

Yogama, Eko Arief (not in RePEc) Gray, Daniel J. (not in RePEc) Rablen, Matthew D. (University of Sheffield)

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We conduct a randomised controlled trial in Indonesia to evaluate the effect of three intervention letters on tax penalty compliance behaviour. Over 10,000 individual taxpayers are randomly assigned to receive either a deterrence, information, or simplification letter, or no letter. Our results indicate that simplification, which makes paying a penalty less burdensome administratively by providing billing codes to pay the penalties, yields the highest probability of timely settlement, increasing compliance by 32% compared to the control group. Deterrence also positively impacts penalty compliance, increasing timely settlement rates by 27%. The least effective intervention is the information letter. Although associated with a 10% increase in timely settlement, this effect is statistically insignificant at the 10% confidence level. Our results suggest that strategic messaging by tax authorities in developing countries can be a cost-effective tool for improving tax penalty payment compliance.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jeborg:v:224:y:2024:i:c:p:548-579
Journal Field
Theory
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-29