Analyst Promotions within Credit Rating Agencies: Accuracy or Bias?

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
Year: 2020
Volume: 55
Issue: 3
Pages: 869-896

Authors (4)

Kisgen, Darren J. (not in RePEc) Nickerson, Jordan (not in RePEc) Osborn, Matthew (not in RePEc) Reuter, Jonathan (Boston College)

Score contribution per author:

0.503 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We estimate Moody’s preference for accurate versus biased ratings using hand-collected data on the internal labor market outcomes of its analysts. We find that accurate analysts are more likely to be promoted and less likely to depart. The opposite is true for analysts who downgrade more frequently, who assign ratings below those predicted by a ratings model, and whose downgrades are associated with large negative market reactions. Downgraded firms are also more likely to be assigned a new analyst. These patterns are consistent with Moody’s balancing its desire for accuracy against its corporate clients’ desire for higher ratings.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:cup:jfinqa:v:55:y:2020:i:3:p:869-896_5
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-29