Demand effects of unilateral versus industry-wide sugar reduction scenarios

B-Tier
Journal: Food Policy
Year: 2024
Volume: 126
Issue: C

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Voluntary food reformulation agreements may often be ineffective due to a lack of industry compliance. This paper examines demand responses and resulting (dis)incentives for companies to reduce the sugar content of children’s cereals in Germany. We estimate the effects of sugar content on consumer choices using a random-coefficient logit model. Subsequently, we simulate how simultaneous and unilateral sugar reductions affect sales, sugar quantities purchased, and consumer welfare. The results identify simultaneous sugar reduction as being most effective in reducing sugar uptake and less harmful to firms’ sales compared to unilateral reformulation. Product reformulation is not strongly compromised by substitution behaviour.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jfpoli:v:126:y:2024:i:c:s0306919224000794
Journal Field
Development
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-29