A stated preference valuation of the non-market benefits of pollination services in the UK

B-Tier
Journal: Ecological Economics
Year: 2015
Volume: 111
Issue: C
Pages: 76-85

Authors (4)

Breeze, T.D. (not in RePEc) Bailey, A.P. (Lincoln University) Potts, S.G. (not in RePEc) Balcombe, K.G. (University of Reading)

Score contribution per author:

0.503 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Using a choice experiment survey this study examines the UK public's willingness to pay to conserve insect pollinators in relation to the levels of two pollination service benefits: maintaining local produce supplies and the aesthetic benefits of diverse wildflower assemblages. Willingness to pay was estimated using a Bayesian mixed logit with two contrasting controls for attribute non-attendance, exclusion and shrinkage. The results suggest that the UK public have an extremely strong preference to avoid a status quo scenario where pollinator populations and pollination services decline. Total willingness to pay was high and did not significantly vary between the two pollination service outputs, producing a conservative total of £379M over a sample of the tax-paying population of the UK, equivalent to £13.4 per UK taxpayer. Using a basic production function approach, the marginal value of pollination services to these attributes is also extrapolated. The study discusses the implications of these findings and directions for related future research into the non-market value of pollination and other ecosystem services.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:ecolec:v:111:y:2015:i:c:p:76-85
Journal Field
Environment
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-24