Does early educational tracking increase migrant-native achievement gaps? Differences-in-differences evidence across countries

B-Tier
Journal: Economics of Education Review
Year: 2016
Volume: 52
Issue: C
Pages: 134-154

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We study whether early tracking of students based on ability increases migrant-native achievement gaps. To eliminate confounding impacts of unobserved country traits, we employ a differences-in-differences strategy that exploits international variation in the age of tracking as well as student achievement before and after potential tracking. Based on pooled data from 12 large-scale international student assessments, we show that cross-sectional estimates are likely to be downward-biased. Our differences-in-differences estimates suggest that early tracking does not significantly affect overall migrant-native achievement gaps, but we find evidence for a detrimental impact for less integrated migrants.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:ecoedu:v:52:y:2016:i:c:p:134-154
Journal Field
Education
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-29